🚨 Bank of Korea Employment Statistics Innovation
Today Korean Economic News for Beginners | 2025.08.09
0️⃣ Tracking Private Jobs Separately to Understand 'Real Economy'
📌 Concerns about distorted employment statistics due to public job increases, BOK develops new indicators to improve policy decision accuracy
💬 The Bank of Korea has started developing new employment indicators that separate public jobs from private jobs. Recent employment growth has mainly relied on government-led public jobs while private companies' actual job creation has weakened. In May, total employment increased by 241,000 people, but many of these were short-term public jobs for people aged 65 and older, while manufacturing jobs actually decreased by 64,000. The BOK plans to publish a monthly 'net private employment indicator' to improve monetary policy decision accuracy and introduce a 'spider web chart' containing multi-dimensional employment indicators like the European Central Bank.
1️⃣ Easy Understanding
Recent employment statistics look good on the surface, but when you look deeper, 'real jobs' haven't increased much. The Bank of Korea is creating new statistics that only count jobs created by private companies to make more accurate economic decisions.
Let me explain the problems with Korea's current employment statistics. The employment numbers announced by Statistics Korea mix both government-created public jobs and jobs created by private companies. For example, in May this year, it was announced that employment increased by over 240,000 people, but many of these were short-term jobs created by the government for elderly people.
These public jobs are mostly short-term contracts lasting a few months, mainly for people over 65 as a form of welfare. Typical examples include park cleaning, library management, and social welfare services. While these jobs are important, they have limitations when judging how active the economy is.
What's really important is how many jobs private companies create. Companies need to expand their business and increase hiring for the economy to grow and consumption to become more active. But recently, these private jobs have actually been decreasing.
For example, in May, manufacturing jobs decreased by 64,000. This means employment in Korea's main industries like automobiles, semiconductors, and steel is declining. This could indicate economic slowdown or reduced investment by companies, but these problems are hidden when you only look at total employment numbers.
This is why the Bank of Korea is creating new indicators. By separating public jobs from private jobs, we can understand the real economic situation more accurately. This allows for better decisions about whether to raise or lower interest rates, or whether economic stimulus is needed.
In essence, the Bank of Korea's new attempt is to distinguish between 'jobs on paper' and 'real jobs'.
2️⃣ Economic Terms
📕 Net Private Employment Indicator
The net private employment indicator is a new statistic that counts only jobs actually created by private companies, excluding public jobs directly created by the government from total employment.
- It can more accurately understand companies' real job creation power and economic conditions.
- It shows actual employment changes in the private sector that were hidden by short-term welfare jobs.
- It enables more precise economic situation judgment when making monetary policy decisions.
📕 Spider Web Chart
A spider web chart is a visual tool that shows various aspects of the labor market at a glance, including employment quantity, quality, wages, labor mobility, and vulnerable group employment.
- It's an advanced analysis tool already used by the European Central Bank (ECB) and US Federal Reserve (Fed).
- It comprehensively evaluates not just the number of employed people but also the qualitative aspects of jobs.
- It helps policymakers easily understand the overall health of the labor market.
📕 Public Employment
Public employment refers to jobs directly created by the government or public institutions, mainly for social purposes or welfare.
- Typical examples include elderly job programs and public work projects.
- Most are short-term contracts with a high proportion of people aged 65 and older.
- While socially meaningful, they have limitations for measuring economic vitality.
📕 Employment Statistics Distortion
Employment statistics distortion is when employment indicators appear different from actual economic conditions due to temporary or artificial factors.
- A typical case is when employment numbers increase due to large public job investments, but private economy performance is poor.
- Such distortion can lead policy authorities to make wrong economic judgments.
- Therefore, it's important to analyze employment indicators in detail.
3️⃣ Principles and Economic Outlook
✅ Problems and Limitations of Public Employment Dependence
Let's analyze the reality that recent employment improvements depend on the public sector and its problems.
First, public jobs have strong temporary characteristics, making them less sustainable. Elderly jobs created by the government are mostly short-term contracts of 6 months to 1 year. Programs like elderly job projects and public work programs can be reduced anytime depending on budget conditions. In May, employment for people over 65 increased by over 200,000, but most of these are low-wage, part-time jobs paying 300,000-500,000 won per month. Meanwhile, the increase in employment for core working-age population (25-54 years old) was relatively small.
Second, weakening job creation in the private sector is a real signal of economic slowdown. The loss of 64,000 manufacturing jobs is not just a statistic but an important indicator of companies' investment willingness and growth prospects. Employment decreases in key industries like automobiles (-18,000) and machinery equipment (-12,000) are directly related to weakening global competitiveness. In this situation, judging employment conditions as good based only on total employment numbers could lead to wrong policy decisions.
Third, there are problems with the qualitative aspects of employment. Public jobs have low wage levels and limited opportunities for skill improvement. When quality jobs in the private sector decrease, overall income levels and consumption capacity inevitably decline. A BOK official emphasized, "It's difficult to understand the real health of the labor market with only quantitative employment indicators. We need to look at qualitative aspects comprehensively."
As dependence on public employment increases, it becomes harder to accurately measure private economy vitality, making new indicator development urgent.
✅ Bank of Korea's New Indicator System
Let's look at the specific content and utilization plans of the new employment indicators the BOK is developing.
First, the net private employment indicator will be a key tool for measuring companies' actual hiring capacity. This indicator excludes government direct jobs (elderly jobs, public work, social service jobs, etc.) from total employment and counts only net employment created by private companies. For example, if total employment increased by 240,000 but public jobs increased by 200,000, net private employment would only increase by 40,000. This allows more accurate understanding of companies' actual investment willingness and growth prospects.
Second, introducing spider web charts will enable multi-dimensional analysis of the employment market. This tool used by the European Central Bank displays 8-10 indicators including employment rate, unemployment rate, wage growth rate, labor mobility rate, and vulnerable group employment rate in one chart. When you mark each indicator's current level compared to past averages as points and connect them, it creates a spider web shape. If the chart expands outward, it means the labor market has improved. This allows understanding of structural changes in the labor market that simple employment numbers alone cannot reveal.
Third, new indicators are expected to significantly improve the precision of monetary policy decisions. The BOK currently uses employment conditions as important evidence for interest rate policy decisions, but existing indicators that include public jobs risk misreading the actual temperature of the private economy. When new indicators are introduced, they can more accurately measure private sector job creation capacity and better judge the timing of interest rate increases or decreases. The BOK plans to include these indicators in monthly Monetary Policy Committee meeting materials.
The new indicator system will provide a foundation for Korea's monetary policy to become more sophisticated and realistic.
✅ Future Outlook and Policy Implications
Let's analyze the long-term impact of employment indicator improvements on Korea's economy and policy.
First, more aggressive economic stimulus measures are likely when private employment is weak. If new indicators confirm that private sector job creation capacity is weaker than expected, the government and BOK may implement more aggressive stimulus policies. This means policy cards like interest rate cuts, expanded liquidity supply, and strengthened corporate investment support could come out faster. Conversely, if private employment is solid, tightening policies may continue due to inflation concerns. Therefore, new indicators will play an important compass role in determining policy direction.
Second, public job policies may be reevaluated. When employment statistics are segmented, the economic effects and limitations of public jobs will become clearer. If it's highlighted that while there are short-term employment indicator improvement effects, there are limitations for private economy activation, the government may focus more on private investment incentives rather than public jobs. For example, policies could shift toward enhancing private job creation capacity through startup support, SME financial support, and deregulation.
Third, international credibility of Korea's employment statistics will also improve. Currently, overseas investors and international organizations had the inconvenience of separately considering the proportion of public jobs when interpreting Korea's employment indicators. However, if private employment indicators are provided separately, it will be easier to understand Korea's actual economic health, which is expected to have positive effects on foreign investment attraction and national credit ratings. Comparisons of employment indicators with other countries will also become more accurate.
Ultimately, this indicator improvement can be evaluated as important institutional progress that makes Korea's economic policy more scientific and realistic.
4️⃣ In Conclusion
The Bank of Korea's development of new employment indicators is an important attempt to raise the precision of Korea's economic policy to the next level. It has established a foundation for implementing more appropriate monetary policy by accurately understanding the real situation of the private economy that was hidden by public jobs.
The biggest problem with Korea's current employment statistics was the inability to distinguish between 'quantitative increase' and 'qualitative improvement'. Employment numbers increased, but most were short-term public jobs, while employment in the private sector that drives economic growth actually decreased repeatedly. In such situations, even if the economy looks good, the vitality of the private economy may actually be declining.
The newly introduced 'net private employment indicator' is a key tool that can solve this optical illusion. By counting only jobs actually created by companies, excluding government jobs, we can measure the real temperature of the economy more accurately. The introduction of spider web charts to comprehensively analyze not only employment quantity but also quality, wages, and labor mobility is also significant progress.
The policy effects of these changes are also expected to be considerable. When private employment conditions are understood more accurately, the timing and intensity of interest rate policy or fiscal policy can be adjusted more appropriately. Policy transformation focusing more on private economy activation through reevaluation of public job policies will also be possible.
However, some tasks need to be resolved for new indicators to be properly utilized. Work is needed to clarify standards for distinguishing public jobs from private jobs and standardize them for international comparison. Education and promotion to increase market participants' understanding of new indicators are also important.
Ultimately, the Bank of Korea's attempt will become the starting point of economic policy that 'sees the essence without being deceived by numbers'. A foundation has been established to accurately diagnose the actual vitality of the private economy and create more effective policies, rather than being complacent with superficial indicator improvements.
Contents