🚨 2-Year Fixed-Term Employment Limit

Today Korean Social News for Beginners | 2026.01.30

0️⃣ Balancing Job Security and Labor Flexibility

📌 Government Signals Changes to 2-Year Limit, Pursuing Labor Flexibility and Wage Reform Together

💬 The Lee Jae-myung government has launched labor structure reforms aimed at reducing the dual labor market structure. The government has established a cross-ministry labor reform task force and is considering extending the fixed-term employment period from the current 2 years to 3 years or more. This reflects concerns that the 2-year limit, contrary to its original intent, actually causes job disruption for non-regular workers. At the same time, the government is discussing shifting from a seniority-based wage system to a job-based pay system and relaxing working hour regulations in strategic industries and mega special zones. While the government says it will balance labor flexibility with worker protection, opposition from labor groups is expected since existing regulations were created to protect workers. Finding balance between job security, labor flexibility, and wage gap reduction is the core challenge of this reform.

💡 Summary

• The 2-year fixed-term limit was introduced to protect non-regular workers but has been criticized for causing job disruption instead.
• The government is pursuing plans to extend the employment period to 3 years or more and shift from seniority-based pay to job-based pay.
• Reaching social consensus between ensuring labor flexibility and protecting workers remains a key challenge.

1️⃣ Definition

The 2-year fixed-term limit refers to a regulation that restricts employers from using fixed-term workers for more than 2 years, requiring automatic conversion to permanent contract status if employment exceeds this period. Based on the Act on Protection of Fixed-Term and Part-Time Workers, this system was introduced in 2007 to prevent long-term job insecurity and abuse of repeated short-term contracts for non-regular workers.

The core principle is that fixed-term employment should only be used for temporary, short-term work, and if the work is continuous and permanent, workers should be converted to regular status. The 2-year period serves as a criterion to distinguish between temporary and permanent work, with employment relationships continuing beyond this automatically converting to permanent contracts.

💡 Why Is This Important?

• It provides minimum legal protection for non-regular workers' job security.
• It prevents employers from abusing contract renewals and protects workers' rights.
• However, in reality, contract termination at the 2-year mark has become common practice, causing job disruption.
• How the reform balances job security and labor flexibility is the key issue.

2️⃣ Current Status and Problems

📕 Background and Purpose of the System

• It was introduced to prevent abuse of non-regular workers. Key background:

  • Non-regular employment surged after the late 1990s financial crisis, increasing job insecurity.
  • Companies continued to reduce regular positions and increase non-regular workers to cut labor costs.
  • Workers' rights were violated through repeated short-term contracts even for continuous, permanent work.
  • The Act on Protection of Fixed-Term and Part-Time Workers was enacted in 2007, introducing the 2-year limit.

• Securing job stability was the main goal. Key purposes:

  • The aim was to encourage regular hiring for permanent work, not temporary tasks.
  • Using the 2-year period to judge work permanence and mandate conversion to permanent contracts.
  • To resolve job insecurity from repeated contracts and guarantee long-term employment.
  • To reduce discrimination between non-regular and regular workers and strengthen rights to equal treatment.

📕 Problems in Implementation

• Contract termination at 2-year mark became standard practice. Key issues:

  • Many companies terminate contracts just before the 2-year mark to avoid permanent conversion burden.
  • This leads to job disruption rather than regular conversion, distorting the original intent.
  • Workers face job loss risk every 2 years, actually increasing job insecurity.
  • Some companies establish practices of rotating workers every 2 years to continuously use non-regular labor.

• Discrimination continues even after permanent conversion. Current situation:

  • Even after permanent conversion, workers often face discrimination in wages, benefits, and promotion compared to regular employees.
  • Job security is formally secured but substantial improvement in treatment doesn't occur.
  • Critics say permanent contract workers are just another form of non-regular employment.
  • The principle of equal pay for equal work doesn't function properly, leaving gaps unresolved.

📕 Deepening Dual Labor Market Structure

• The gap between large company regulars and SME non-regulars has solidified. Key problems:

  • Large company regular workers enjoy high wages and stable employment, while SME non-regular workers remain in low-wage, unstable jobs.
  • The 2-year limit was introduced to ease this dual structure but actually restricted mobility.
  • Conversion from non-regular to regular is difficult, and movement from SMEs to large companies is blocked.
  • Young people often struggle to find stable jobs, moving between non-regular positions.

• Seniority-based pay has widened wage gaps. Key causes:

  • Seniority pay automatically increases wages based on years of service, favoring regular workers.
  • Non-regular workers have limited wage growth as their short-term contracts don't count toward seniority.
  • Wage gaps occur based on employment type even for the same work.
  • The government is considering job-based pay to address this issue.

💡 Key Problems with 2-Year Fixed-Term Limit

1. Job Disruption: Contract termination at 2-year mark has become standard, increasing job insecurity
2. Permanent Contract Discrimination: Wage and benefit gaps with regular workers persist after conversion
3. Fixed Dual Structure: Limited labor market mobility fails to resolve gaps
4. Seniority Pay Side Effects: Tenure-based wage system deepens non-regular worker discrimination
5. System Evasion: Companies circumvent law's intent through 2-year worker rotation

3️⃣ Government Reform Plans and Issues

✅ Extending Fixed-Term Employment Period

• Considering extension from 2 years to 3 years or more. Key details:

  • The government recognizes that the 2-year limit actually causes job disruption.
  • Extending the period to 3+ years would give workers opportunities to work longer.
  • For companies, increased flexibility in workforce management could create room for more hiring.
  • However, simply extending the period without regular conversion or treatment improvements could prolong unstable employment.

• Protective measures needed alongside period extension. Key tasks:

  • Permanent conversion obligations must remain clear even after extending the period.
  • Discrimination against permanent contract workers must be prohibited and equal pay principles strengthened.
  • Institutional safeguards needed to prevent unfair contract terminations or renewal refusals.
  • Careful system design required to ensure vulnerable workers aren't disadvantaged.

✅ Wage System Reform

• Pursuing shift from seniority pay to job-based pay. Key direction:

  • Seniority pay is tenure-based, disadvantaging non-regular workers and widening wage gaps.
  • Job-based pay determines wages by job difficulty, responsibility, and skill level.
  • Workers performing the same job can receive equal wages regardless of employment type.
  • The government aims to realize equal pay for equal work and reduce wage gaps.

• Many challenges remain for job-based pay adoption. Key issues:

  • Agreement needed on how to set job evaluation criteria and who evaluates.
  • Opposition expected from current seniority pay workers whose wages may decrease.
  • SMEs may lack capacity to build job evaluation systems.
  • Risk of arbitrary evaluation creating new forms of discrimination.

✅ Relaxing Working Hour Regulations

• Discussing relaxation focused on strategic industries and mega special zones. Key details:

  • Argument that working hour flexibility is needed for global competitiveness in industries like semiconductors.
  • Plans considered to ease the 52-hour weekly limit or expand flexible work systems within mega special zones.
  • Companies see this as improving workforce flexibility and productivity.
  • However, concerns are high about health rights violations and work-life balance deterioration from long hours.

• Balance needed between worker protection and industrial competitiveness. Key tasks:

  • Must clearly distinguish which industries and jobs need regulatory relaxation.
  • Mechanisms prioritizing worker health and safety must be established.
  • Adequate compensation and rest guarantees needed for extended work hours.
  • One-sided pursuit without social consensus could provoke strong labor opposition.

4️⃣ Related Terms

🔎 Act on Protection of Fixed-Term and Part-Time Workers

• This law prohibits discrimination against non-regular workers and protects their rights.
  • Enacted in 2007, this law established legal grounds to protect working conditions and correct discrimination for fixed-term and part-time workers. The core provision limits fixed-term employment to 2 years, with automatic conversion to permanent status if exceeded.
  • Main provisions include: First, employers cannot use fixed-term workers beyond 2 years; violations result in deemed permanent employment contracts. Second, discriminatory treatment based on fixed-term status is prohibited. Third, part-time workers receive the same protections, with priority opportunities for conversion to full-time. Fourth, workers can request corrections from the Labor Relations Commission for discrimination.
  • However, since implementation, many companies have circumvented the law by terminating contracts at the 2-year mark, drawing criticism that the original intent of job security hasn't been properly achieved. The government is considering extending the employment period while strengthening substantial protective measures to address these issues.

🔎 Permanent Contract Conversion System

• This system converts fixed-term workers who work beyond a certain period to workers without fixed employment terms.
  • Permanent contracts refer to employment contracts without set end dates, formally similar to regular employment. Under the 2-year limit, workers automatically convert to permanent status after 2 years. Additionally, many non-regular workers in the public sector were converted to permanent contracts through 2017 regular employment conversion policies.
  • Characteristics of permanent contracts: First, higher job security as workers cannot be dismissed without just cause. Second, entitled to severance pay and welfare benefits. Third, legally treated the same as regular workers under labor standards law as they're not fixed-term.
  • However, in reality, they often face discrimination in wages and promotion compared to regular workers. Permanent contract workers often receive lower wages under separate pay scales or have limited promotion opportunities. This has drawn criticism as "regular in name only," with permanent contracts solidifying as another form of non-regular employment. Thoroughly applying equal pay for equal work principles to eliminate substantial discrimination remains a challenge.

🔎 Dual Labor Market Structure

• The dual labor market structure refers to solidified gaps in wages and job security between large company regular workers and SME/non-regular workers.
  • Korea's labor market is divided between the primary market centered on large companies/regular workers and the secondary market centered on SMEs/non-regular workers, with very large gaps between the two groups. Large company regular workers enjoy high wages, stable employment, and good benefits, while SME non-regular workers face low wages, unstable employment, and poor working conditions.
  • Characteristics of the dual structure: First, wage gaps are very large. Average wages for large company regular workers are often more than double those of SME non-regular workers. Second, labor market mobility is low. Once employed as non-regular or at SMEs, moving to regular positions at large companies is very difficult. Third, generational gaps also solidify. Young people struggle to find stable jobs, moving between non-regular positions.
  • While the 2-year limit was introduced to ease this dual structure, some assess it actually restricted non-regular worker mobility. The government plans to resolve the dual structure through regulatory relaxation for fixed-term workers, job-based pay adoption, and strengthening equal pay for equal work. However, institutional changes alone have limits, requiring comprehensive approaches including corporate culture improvement, SME competitiveness enhancement, and balancing labor market flexibility with security.

🔎 Job-Based Pay vs. Seniority Pay

• Seniority pay automatically increases wages based on years of service, while job-based pay determines compensation by job difficulty and responsibility.
  • Seniority pay has long been used in Korea's labor market, with wages increasing by set amounts annually based on years since hiring. It has advantages of encouraging tenure and promoting long-term employment, but doesn't reflect work performance or job value. Particularly, non-regular workers can't benefit from seniority pay as their short-term contracts aren't recognized for tenure, further widening wage gaps with regular workers.
  • Job-based pay determines wages by job difficulty, responsibility, and skill level rather than years of service. Workers performing the same job can receive equal wages regardless of employment type, advantageous for realizing equal pay for equal work. It can also contribute to productivity improvements by enabling performance and capability-based compensation.
  • However, many challenges exist for job-based pay adoption. First, setting standards for job evaluation and grading is difficult. Second, opposition is expected from current seniority pay workers whose wages may decrease. Third, SMEs lack capacity to build job evaluation systems. Fourth, risks exist of arbitrary evaluation creating new discrimination. The government is gradually expanding job-based pay while establishing fair evaluation systems and seeking solutions acceptable to both workers and companies.

5️⃣ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Will extending the 2-year limit benefit workers?

A: Period extension alone is insufficient; regular conversion and treatment improvements must occur together.

• Extending the fixed-term period from 2 to 3+ years creates opportunities for workers to stay at one workplace longer. It would reduce job disruption from contract termination at the 2-year mark, enabling more stable employment. For companies, increased workforce flexibility could create room for more hiring.
• However, if only the period is extended without regular conversion or treatment improvements, unstable employment simply extends from 2 to 3 years without resolving fundamental problems. What matters is ensuring permanent contract conversion definitely occurs after the extended period, with legal protections strengthened so converted workers receive equal treatment as regular employees. Institutional safeguards are also needed to prevent unfair contract terminations or renewal refusals. Workers benefit when substantial job security and discrimination elimination occur together, not just period extension.

Q: Will wages decrease under job-based pay?

A: It depends on job evaluation results; establishing fair evaluation systems is key.

• Job-based pay determines wages by job difficulty, responsibility, and skill level rather than years of service. Therefore, some workers currently receiving high wages under seniority pay may see wage decreases when shifting to job-based pay. Those with long tenure but low job difficulty may be particularly disadvantaged.
• However, not everyone's wages will decrease. Workers performing highly skilled jobs with significant responsibility may actually see wage increases. Particularly, workers with short tenure like non-regular workers or women with career breaks could benefit by receiving equal wages as regular workers for the same jobs. What matters is that job evaluation is conducted fairly and transparently. Clear evaluation criteria are needed with assessment systems where labor and management participate together. Additionally, transitional measures are necessary to prevent sudden wage fluctuations, with gradual phased transitions.

Q: What's needed for successful labor structure reform?

A: Social consensus among labor, management and government, phased implementation, and substantial protective measures are essential.

• Labor structure reform fundamentally changes labor market structures, making success difficult if pursued unilaterally by government. Consensus must be found through social dialogue involving labor, management, and government together. Sufficient discussion and agreement must precede sensitive issues like extending fixed-term periods, job-based pay adoption, and working hour deregulation.
• Additionally, reforms should be pursued in phases. Trying to change everything at once only increases confusion and opposition. It's better to pilot in public sectors or large companies first, address problems, then gradually expand. Most importantly, substantial protective measures must be established to ensure reforms don't disadvantage vulnerable workers. When extending fixed-term periods, permanent conversion obligations must be clear; when introducing job-based pay, fair evaluation systems must be created; when relaxing working hour regulations, health protection mechanisms must be strengthened. Balancing expanded labor flexibility with worker protection is key to reform success.

Table of Contents

• Go to Guide